State v. Metz
This text of 2020 ND 158 (State v. Metz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Filed 07/22/20 by Clerk of Supreme Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
2020 ND 158
State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee v. Russell James Metz, Defendant and Appellant
No. 20200023
Appeal from the District Court of Burleigh County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable Douglas A. Bahr, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Justin J. Schwarz, Assistant State’s Attorney, Bismarck, ND, for plaintiff and appellee.
Kiara C. Kraus-Parr, Grand Forks, ND, for defendant and appellant. State v. Metz No. 20200023
[¶1] Russell Metz appeals from a district court’s judgment entered after a jury convicted him of conspiracy to commit burglary, in violation of N.D.C.C. §§ 12.1-06-04 and 12.1-22-02(1), a class C felony. Metz challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict. After reviewing the record, we conclude sufficient evidence supports the verdict. We summarily affirm the criminal judgment under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3).
[¶2] Jon J. Jensen, C.J. Daniel J. Crothers Lisa Fair McEvers Gerald W. VandeWalle Jerod E. Tufte
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2020 ND 158, 946 N.W.2d 506, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-metz-nd-2020.