State v. Meador

Ohio Supreme Court

State v. Meador

2009 Ohio 5861, 123 Ohio St. 3d 450

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided November 10, 2009·No. 2009-0884·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

{¶ 1} The discretionary appeal is not accepted.

{¶ 2} The discretionary cross-appeal is accepted.

{¶ 3} The judgment of the court of appeals holding as moot the assignment of error in which appellant below challenged the sufficiency of the evidence is reversed, and the cause is remanded to the court of appeals for consideration of that assignment of error.

Judgment reversed and cause remanded.

Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

{¶ 1} The discretionary appeal is not accepted.

{¶ 2} The discretionary cross-appeal is accepted.

{¶ 3} The judgment of the court of appeals holding as moot the assignment of error in which appellant below challenged the sufficiency of the evidence is reversed, and the cause is remanded to the court of appeals for consideration of that assignment of error.

Judgment reversed and cause remanded.

Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur.

State v. Meador, 2009 Ohio 5861, 123 Ohio St. 3d 450 (Ohio 2009).

Pincite

2009 Ohio 5861 (State v. Meador) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related