State v. McRoberts

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. McRoberts

298 S.W.3d 929, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1774, 2009 WL 4878587

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided December 15, 2009·No. ED 92814·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, Marco McRoberts, appeals from the judgment entered on a jury verdict finding him guilty of murder in the first degree, in violation of section 565.020 RSMo (2000), and armed criminal action, in violation of section 571.015 RSMo (2000). The trial court found defendant to be a persistent offender and sentenced him to life imprisonment on each count, to be served concurrently.

No error of law appears and no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, Marco McRoberts, appeals from the judgment entered on a jury verdict finding him guilty of murder in the first degree, in violation of section 565.020 RSMo (2000), and armed criminal action, in violation of section 571.015 RSMo (2000). The trial court found defendant to be a persistent offender and sentenced him to life imprisonment on each count, to be served concurrently.

No error of law appears and no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

State v. McRoberts, 298 S.W.3d 929, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1774, 2009 WL 4878587 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

298 S.W.3d 929 (State v. McRoberts) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related