CLEARY BUILDING CORP. v. Singleton

Missouri Court of Appeals

CLEARY BUILDING CORP. v. Singleton

298 S.W.3d 929, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1799, 2009 WL 4907059

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided December 22, 2009·No. WD 70017·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Appellant Cleary Building Corp. filed this suit against Respondents Jerry and Rebecca Singleton, arising out of Cleary’s construction of a building on the Singletons’ property. Jerry Singleton counterclaimed, alleging that Cleary’s conduct in constructing the building not only breached the contract, but also violated the Missouri Merchandising Practices Act, §§ 407.010-407.309, RSMo.

After a bench trial, the trial court found in favor of the Singletons and against Cleary. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order has been provided to the parties. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Appellant Cleary Building Corp. filed this suit against Respondents Jerry and Rebecca Singleton, arising out of Cleary’s construction of a building on the Singletons’ property. Jerry Singleton counterclaimed, alleging that Cleary’s conduct in constructing the building not only breached the contract, but also violated the Missouri Merchandising Practices Act, §§ 407.010-407.309, RSMo.

After a bench trial, the trial court found in favor of the Singletons and against Cleary. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order has been provided to the parties. Rule 84.16(b).

CLEARY BUILDING CORP. v. Singleton, 298 S.W.3d 929, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1799, 2009 WL 4907059 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

298 S.W.3d 929 (CLEARY BUILDING CORP. v. Singleton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related