State v. McPherson

Nebraska Supreme Court

State v. McPherson

453 N.W.2d 745, 235 Neb. 107, 1990 Neb. LEXIS 113

CourtNebraska Supreme Court

DecidedApril 20, 1990

DocketNo. 89-060

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 453 N.W.2d 745 (State v. McPherson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. McPherson, 453 N.W.2d 745, 235 Neb. 107, 1990 Neb. LEXIS 113 (Neb. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Upon consideration of the record, briefs, and recommendation of the Appellate Division of the District Court, the court notes plain error as to the enhancement of the sentence, in that the record fails to disclose that defendant was represented by counsel at the time of the second conviction; therefore, the sentence is vacated, and the cause is remanded to the district court for resentencing.

Sentence vacated, and cause remanded for resentencing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Upon consideration of the record, briefs, and recommendation of the Appellate Division of the District Court, the court notes plain error as to the enhancement of the sentence, in that the record fails to disclose that defendant was represented by counsel at the time of the second conviction; therefore, the sentence is vacated, and the cause is remanded to the district court for resentencing.

Sentence vacated, and cause remanded for resentencing.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

453 N.W.2d 745, 235 Neb. 107, 1990 Neb. LEXIS 113, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-mcpherson-neb-1990.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack