Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/State v. McKinnon

State v. McKinnon

546 So. 2d 464, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1764, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 4182, 1989 WL 81753
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 26, 1989
DocketNo. 88-3008
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 546 So. 2d 464 (State v. McKinnon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. McKinnon, 546 So. 2d 464, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1764, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 4182, 1989 WL 81753 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

REVERSED. A trial court must deny a motion to dismiss if the state files a sworn traverse specifically denying the allega[465]*465tions of the motion. State v. Damico, 542 So.2d 1066 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989).

ANSTEAD, DELL and STONE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Presume
710 So. 2d 604 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)
State v. Hysell
569 So. 2d 866 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
546 So. 2d 464, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1764, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 4182, 1989 WL 81753, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-mckinnon-fladistctapp-1989.