State v. Damico

District Court of Appeal of Florida

State v. Damico

542 So. 2d 1066, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1148, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 2560, 1989 WL 47153

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 10, 1989

DocketNo. 88-0853

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 542 So. 2d 1066 (State v. Damico) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Damico, 542 So. 2d 1066, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1148, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 2560, 1989 WL 47153 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellee filed a motion, pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.190(c)(4), to dismiss the information which charged him with carrying a concealed firearm, in violation of section 790.01(2), Florida Statutes (1987). The state filed a traverse which we hold met the requirements of Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.190(d). Therefore we reverse the order granting appellee’s motion to dismiss the information on the authority of State v. Hunwick, 446 So.2d 214 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984) and State v. Oberholtzer, 411 So.2d 376 (Fla. 4th DCA), petition for review denied, 419 So.2d 1199 (Fla.1982). We remand this cause to the trial court for further proceedings.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

DELL, WALDEN and POLEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellee filed a motion, pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.190(c)(4), to dismiss the information which charged him with carrying a concealed firearm, in violation of section 790.01(2), Florida Statutes (1987). The state filed a traverse which we hold met the requirements of Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.190(d). Therefore we reverse the order granting appellee’s motion to dismiss the information on the authority of State v. Hunwick, 446 So.2d 214 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984) and State v. Oberholtzer, 411 So.2d 376 (Fla. 4th DCA), petition for review denied, 419 So.2d 1199 (Fla.1982). We remand this cause to the trial court for further proceedings.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

DELL, WALDEN and POLEN, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

542 So. 2d 1066, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1148, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 2560, 1989 WL 47153, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-damico-fladistctapp-1989.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack