State v. Damico

542 So. 2d 1066, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1148, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 2560, 1989 WL 47153
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 10, 1989·No. No. 88-0853·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellee filed a motion, pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.190(c)(4), to dismiss the information which charged him with carrying a concealed firearm, in violation of section 790.01(2), Florida Statutes (1987). The state filed a traverse which we hold met the requirements of Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.190(d). Therefore we reverse the order granting appellee’s motion to dismiss the information on the authority of State v. Hunwick, 446 So.2d 214 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984) and State v. Oberholtzer, 411 So.2d 376 (Fla. 4th DCA), petition for review denied, 419 So.2d 1199 (Fla.1982). We remand this cause to the trial court for further proceedings.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

DELL, WALDEN and POLEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Damico, 542 So. 2d 1066, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1148, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 2560, 1989 WL 47153 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

542 So. 2d 1066 (State v. Damico) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. McKinnon
546 So. 2d 464 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)