State v. McKay
20 Mo. App. 149, 1886 Mo. App. LEXIS 357
Opinion
The defendant was indicted for obstructing a public road. There was no evidence, direct or from which it could have been inferred, that the offence was committed in Linn county. For this reason the judgment must be reversed. The State v. Hughes, 82 Mo. 88; The State v. Apperger, 80 Mo. 173; The State v. Wheeler, 79 Mo. 366; The State v. Inman, 76 Mo. 548; The State v. Babb, 76 Mo. 503; The State v. Hartnett, 75 Mo. 251; The State v. Burgess, 75 Mo. 541; The State v. Hughes, 71 Mo. 633.
The judgment reversed and the cause remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. McKay, 20 Mo. App. 149, 1886 Mo. App. LEXIS 357 (Mo. Ct. App. 1886).
20 Mo. App. 149 (State v. McKay) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Chilton
39 Mo. App. 51 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1890)