State v. McKay

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. McKay

20 Mo. App. 149, 1886 Mo. App. LEXIS 357

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJanuary 4, 1886

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 20 Mo. App. 149 (State v. McKay) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. McKay, 20 Mo. App. 149, 1886 Mo. App. LEXIS 357 (Mo. Ct. App. 1886).

Pincite

Opinion

Hall, J.

The defendant was indicted for obstructing a public road. There was no evidence, direct or from which it could have been inferred, that the offence was committed in Linn county. For this reason the judgment must be reversed. The State v. Hughes, 82 Mo. 88; The State v. Apperger, 80 Mo. 173; The State v. Wheeler, 79 Mo. 366; The State v. Inman, 76 Mo. 548; The State v. Babb, 76 Mo. 503; The State v. Hartnett, 75 Mo. 251; The State v. Burgess, 75 Mo. 541; The State v. Hughes, 71 Mo. 633.

The judgment reversed and the cause remanded.

All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hall, J.

The defendant was indicted for obstructing a public road. There was no evidence, direct or from which it could have been inferred, that the offence was committed in Linn county. For this reason the judgment must be reversed. The State v. Hughes, 82 Mo. 88; The State v. Apperger, 80 Mo. 173; The State v. Wheeler, 79 Mo. 366; The State v. Inman, 76 Mo. 548; The State v. Babb, 76 Mo. 503; The State v. Hartnett, 75 Mo. 251; The State v. Burgess, 75 Mo. 541; The State v. Hughes, 71 Mo. 633.

The judgment reversed and the cause remanded.

All concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

20 Mo. App. 149, 1886 Mo. App. LEXIS 357, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-mckay-moctapp-1886.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack