State v. Burgess

75 Mo. 541
Supreme Court of Missouri·Decided April 15, 1882·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

Sherwood, C. J.

We reverse the judgment herein,, and remand the cause, for the reason that no venue was proven. True, it ivas in evidence that the homicide was committed in “Camden Point,” and the defendant testified that he had “ been in Platte county four or five days before the difficulty,” but it nowhere appears that “Camden Point” is in Platte county, nor is. to be inferred that-it'is in that county from the testimony of defendant as to his whereabouts for four or five days prior.to the occurrence on which the indictment is based. This ease is, therefore» on all-fours with that of State v. McGinniss, 74 Mo. 245. "We shall not rule on any other question in the case, as it may not be necessary in the event of a new trial.

All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Burgess, 75 Mo. 541 (Mo. 1882).

75 Mo. 541 (State v. Burgess) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Kenyon
126 S.W.2d 245 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1939)
Whitman v. State
31 A. 325 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1895)
State v. King
20 S.W. 299 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1892)
State v. Hopper
21 Mo. App. 510 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1886)
State v. Quaite
20 Mo. App. 405 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1886)
State v. McKay
20 Mo. App. 149 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1886)
State v. Hughes
82 Mo. 86 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1884)
State v. Babb
76 Mo. 501 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1882)