State v. . McIntosh

64 N.C. 607
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedJune 5, 1870
StatusPublished

This text of 64 N.C. 607 (State v. . McIntosh) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. . McIntosh, 64 N.C. 607 (N.C. 1870).

Opinion

Upon the trial of the issues, the defendant tendered himself as a witness, but his Honor excluded him, as incompetent. The defendant excepted.

Verdict, Guilty; Judgment accordingly, and Appeal by the defendant. A proceeding in bastardy, is a civil action, as distinguished from a criminal action: Const. Art. IV, § 1.

Under the Code of Civil Procedure, it is a special proceeding, as distinguished from a civil action proper. In such special proceeding a party may be examined as a witness in his own behalf: C.C.P. §§ 342-3;State v. Waldrop, 63 N.C. 507; State v. Pate, 44 N.C. 244.

There was error in the ruling of his Honor, and there must be a venirede novo upon the issue submitted.

Let this be certified.

Per curiam.

Venire de novo.

Cited: S. v. Hickerson, 72 N.C. 422; S. v. Crouse, 86 N.C. 619; S. v.Ballard, 122 N.C. 1028; S. v. Liles, 134 N.C. 737. *Page 473

(608)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Benbow v. . Robbins .
72 N.C. 422 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1875)
State v. . Crouse
86 N.C. 617 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1882)
State Ex Rel. Donaldson v. Waldrop
63 N.C. 507 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1869)
State v. Ballard
122 N.C. 1024 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1898)
State v. Liles
134 N.C. 735 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1904)
State v. Pate
44 N.C. 244 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1853)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
64 N.C. 607, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-mcintosh-nc-1870.