State Ex Rel. Donaldson v. Waldrop

63 N.C. 507
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedJune 5, 1869
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 63 N.C. 507 (State Ex Rel. Donaldson v. Waldrop) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State Ex Rel. Donaldson v. Waldrop, 63 N.C. 507 (N.C. 1869).

Opinion

Rodman, J.

(After stating the case as above.) It is difficult to imagine a reason for supposing that the County' Commissioners, had any jurisdiction in the premises. They have *508 no judicial powers at all. Proceedings in bastardy are in the nature of a civil action. State ex. rel. Adams v. Pate, Bus. 244. The Superior Court have exclusive original jurisdiction in all cases when it is not given to some other Court. Const. .Art. IY, Sec. 15. Chapter 12 of the Revised Code concerning •bastardy is still in force, except so far as it has been incidentally modified by the change in the system of Courts. The Judge was right in refusing the motion. Judgment that the State recover costs in this Court.

Let this opinion be certified.

Her Curiam. Order accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. . Liles
47 S.E. 750 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1904)
State v. Ballard
122 N.C. 1024 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1898)
State v. . McIntosh
64 N.C. 607 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1870)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
63 N.C. 507, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-donaldson-v-waldrop-nc-1869.