State v. McGinness

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. McGinness

303 S.W.3d 631, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 208, 2010 WL 623640

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedFebruary 23, 2010

DocketED 92417

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 303 S.W.3d 631 (State v. McGinness) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. McGinness, 303 S.W.3d 631, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 208, 2010 WL 623640 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Matthew McGinness (hereinafter, “Defendant”) appeals from the trial court’s judgment entered after a jury found him guilty of driving while intoxicated, Section 577.010 RSMo (2000) 1 , and driving while his license was revoked, Section 302.321.

The trial court sentenced Defendant to seven years’ imprisonment.

On appeal, Defendant raises one allegation of error, challenging his conviction for driving while intoxicated. He claims the trial court erred in overruling his motion to exclude the testimony of one witness and his laboratory report, or in the alternative, grant him a continuance.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only, setting forth the reasons for our decision.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

1

. All further statutory references are to RSMo (2000) unless otherwise indicated.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI