State v. Gladney

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Gladney

303 S.W.3d 631, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 207, 2010 WL 623642

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedFebruary 23, 2010

DocketED 92515

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 303 S.W.3d 631 (State v. Gladney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Gladney, 303 S.W.3d 631, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 207, 2010 WL 623642 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Charles Gladney appeals the judgment entered upon a jury verdict convicting him of robbery in the first degree and armed criminal action. We find that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying Gladney’s request for a mistrial. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment under Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Charles Gladney appeals the judgment entered upon a jury verdict convicting him of robbery in the first degree and armed criminal action. We find that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying Gladney’s request for a mistrial. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment under Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

303 S.W.3d 631, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 207, 2010 WL 623642, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-gladney-moctapp-2010.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack