State v. McGill

252 S.W.3d 224, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 632, 2008 WL 1958924
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided May 6, 2008·No. ED 90120·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Sterling McGill (Defendant) appeals from the trial court’s judgment and sentence imposed after a jury found him guilty of one count of second-degree drug trafficking, in violation of Section 195.223 RSMo 2000. The trial court sentenced Defendant as a prior drug offender to ten years’ imprisonment.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. McGill, 252 S.W.3d 224, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 632, 2008 WL 1958924 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

252 S.W.3d 224 (State v. McGill) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McGill v. State
330 S.W.3d 501 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2010)