McGill v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

McGill v. State

330 S.W.3d 501, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 271, 2010 WL 785333

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMarch 9, 2010

DocketED 92634

StatusPublished

This text of 330 S.W.3d 501 (McGill v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McGill v. State, 330 S.W.3d 501, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 271, 2010 WL 785333 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Sterling L. McGill appeals the motion court’s denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentia-ry hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

*502 The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Sterling L. McGill appeals the motion court’s denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentia-ry hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

*502 The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

330 S.W.3d 501, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 271, 2010 WL 785333, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcgill-v-state-moctapp-2010.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack