State v. McDougald
653 S.E.2d 152, 361 N.C. 689, 2007 N.C. LEXIS 1038
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. McDougald. Read the opinion of the Court — 362 N.C. 224 →
Opinion
ORDER
Defendant’s petition for discretionary review as to additional issues is allowed with respect to defendant’s argument that his appeal of his jury conviction for conspiracy to traffic by possessing 100 or more but less than 500 dosages of methylenedioxyamphetamine was not in violation of the North Carolina Rules of Appellate Procedure. The remainder of defendant’s petition for discretionary review as to additional issues is denied.
By order of the Court in conference, this 11th day of October 2007.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. McDougald, 653 S.E.2d 152, 361 N.C. 689, 2007 N.C. LEXIS 1038 (N.C. 2007).
653 S.E.2d 152 (State v. McDougald) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.