State v. McDougald

657 S.E.2d 351
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedMarch 7, 2008
DocketNo. 64A07.
StatusPublished

This text of 657 S.E.2d 351 (State v. McDougald) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. McDougald, 657 S.E.2d 351 (N.C. 2008).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals to this Court from the decision of the Court of Appeals on the basis of a dissent. In light of the State's concession of error, we reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals as to the appealable issue of right i.e. whether it was appropriate to dismiss defendant's appeal on procedural grounds. The case is remanded to the Court of Appeals to determine if any error under Georgia v. Randolph, 547 U.S. 103, 126 S.Ct. 1515, 164 L.Ed.2d 208 (2006) was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. The remaining issues addressed by the Court of Appeals are not before this Court and its decision as to these issues remains undisturbed.

REVERSED IN PART AND REMANDED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Georgia v. Randolph
547 U.S. 103 (Supreme Court, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
657 S.E.2d 351, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-mcdougald-nc-2008.