State v. McCurdy

Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee·Decided March 23, 1998·No. 03C01-9706-CR-00232·Published

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE

DECEMBER SESSION, 1997 FILED March 23, 1998

Cecil Crowson, Jr.

STATE OF TENNESSEE, ) Appellate C ourt Clerk ) No. 03C01-9706-CR-00232 Appellee )

) UNION COUNTY

vs. )

) Hon. LEE ASBURY, Judge ROBERT H. McCURDY, )

) (Aggravated Sexual Battery)

Appellant )

SEPARATE CONCURRING OPINION

I concur in the results reached by the majority. For those reasons expressed

in State v. Cooper, No. 01C01-9604-CC-00150 (Tenn. Crim. App. at Nashville, Nov.

17, 1997) (Hayes, J., concurring), I write separately to note my agreement with the

trial judge that the so-called truth in sentencing provisions, as codified in Tenn. Code

Ann. § 40-35-201, are unconstitutional. Accordingly, I find no error in the trial court's

rejection of the requested instructions.

DAVID G. HAYES, Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. McCurdy, (Tenn. Ct. App. 1998).

State v. McCurdy (State v. McCurdy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 40-35-201
Tennessee § 40-35-201