State v. McClendon

157 S.W.3d 343, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 282, 2005 WL 406289
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 22, 2005·No. ED 84351·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Donald C. McClendon (Defendant) appeals from the judgment upon his conviction of attempted stealing of a motor vehicle, Section 564.011, RSMo 2000, and Section 570.030.3(3), RSMo Cum.Supp. 2004, for which Defendant was sentenced to nine years’ imprisonment as a prior and persistent offender under Section 558.016, RSMo Cum.Supp.2004.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating principles of law would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. McClendon, 157 S.W.3d 343, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 282, 2005 WL 406289 (Mo. Ct. App. 2005).

157 S.W.3d 343 (State v. McClendon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McClendon v. State
247 S.W.3d 549 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2007)
Radcliff v. ROCKWOOD BANK
157 S.W.3d 343 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2005)