Radcliff v. ROCKWOOD BANK
This text of 157 S.W.3d 343 (Radcliff v. ROCKWOOD BANK) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
Venga and Tammy Radcliff, individually, and Venga as duly appointed Plaintiff ad Litem for her deceased husband Charles Radcliff, appeal the judgment of the Circuit Court of St. Louis County granting Rockwood Bank’s Motion to Dismiss the Radcliffs’ negligent infection of emotional distress action for failure to state a claim or cause of action.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and no error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision.
We affirm the award pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
157 S.W.3d 343, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 643, 2005 WL 406288, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/radcliff-v-rockwood-bank-moctapp-2005.