Home/Court of Appeals of Oregon/State v. McCall

State v. McCall

260 P.3d 835, 245 Or. App. 299
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedAugust 31, 2011
Docket09102043 A145742
StatusPublished

This text of 260 P.3d 835 (State v. McCall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. McCall, 260 P.3d 835, 245 Or. App. 299 (Or. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

260 P.3d 835 (2011)
245 Or. App. 299

STATE of Oregon, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Robin L. McCALL, Defendant-Respondent.

09102043; A145742.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Argued and Submitted July 26, 2011.
Decided August 31, 2011.

Janet A. Klapstein, Senior Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for appellant. With her on the brief were John R. Kroger, Attorney General, and Mary H. Williams, Solicitor General.

Stephen R. Ensor, Corvallis, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Ringo Stuber Ensor & Hadlock.

Before ORTEGA, Presiding Judge, and SERCOMBE, Judge, and EDMONDS, Senior Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Reversed and remanded. State v. Wimber, 315 Or. 103, 843 P.2d 424 (1992).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Wimber
843 P.2d 424 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1992)
State v. McCall
260 P.3d 835 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
260 P.3d 835, 245 Or. App. 299, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-mccall-orctapp-2011.