State v. Mayor of Hoboken
36 A. 1129, 58 N.J.L. 696, 29 Vroom 696, 1896 N.J. LEXIS 59
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Mayor of Hoboken. Read the opinion of the Court — 59 N.J.L. 383 →
Opinion
The judgment of the Supreme Court is affirmed, for the reasons given by that court.
[697]*697For affirmance—The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Depue, Garrison, Gummere, Lippincott, Ludlow, Magie, Van Syckel, Barkalow, Bogert, Nixon. 12.
For reversal—None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Mayor of Hoboken, 36 A. 1129, 58 N.J.L. 696, 29 Vroom 696, 1896 N.J. LEXIS 59 (N.J. 1896).
36 A. 1129 (State v. Mayor of Hoboken) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.