State v. Mayor of Hoboken
36 A. 1129, 58 N.J.L. 696, 29 Vroom 696, 1896 N.J. LEXIS 59
This text of 36 A. 1129 (State v. Mayor of Hoboken) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
State v. Mayor of Hoboken, 36 A. 1129, 58 N.J.L. 696, 29 Vroom 696, 1896 N.J. LEXIS 59 (N.J. 1896).
Opinion
The judgment of the Supreme Court is affirmed, for the reasons given by that court.
[697]*697For affirmance—The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Depue, Garrison, Gummere, Lippincott, Ludlow, Magie, Van Syckel, Barkalow, Bogert, Nixon. 12.
For reversal—None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
36 A. 1129, 58 N.J.L. 696, 29 Vroom 696, 1896 N.J. LEXIS 59, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-mayor-of-hoboken-nj-1896.