State v. May
190 S.W.3d 605, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 626, 2006 WL 1222705
Opinion
ORDER
Nathaniel L. May appeals his conviction and sentence on two counts of delivery of a controlled substance, under section 195.211, RSMo Cum.Supp.2005. Because a published opinion would have no prece-dential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties.
The judgment is affirmed. Rule 80.25(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. May, 190 S.W.3d 605, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 626, 2006 WL 1222705 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006).
190 S.W.3d 605 (State v. May) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Davis v. State
190 S.W.3d 605 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2006)