State v. May

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. May

149 S.W.3d 916, 2004 Mo. App. LEXIS 1851, 2004 WL 2791018

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. May. Read the opinion of the Court — 2002 Mo. App. LEXIS 424 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided December 7, 2004·No. No. WD 63211·Published

Opinion

ORDER

Loren May appeals his conviction for drug trafficking in the second degree. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record, and find no error of law. A written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the applicable principles of law would have no precedential or jurisprudential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

Loren May appeals his conviction for drug trafficking in the second degree. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record, and find no error of law. A written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the applicable principles of law would have no precedential or jurisprudential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

State v. May, 149 S.W.3d 916, 2004 Mo. App. LEXIS 1851, 2004 WL 2791018 (Mo. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

149 S.W.3d 916 (State v. May) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.