State v. Maxwell

988 P.2d 939, 164 Or. App. 171, 1999 Ore. App. LEXIS 1952
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided November 10, 1999·No. 57-97-09056; CA A99806·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Appellant appeals from an order determining that he is mentally ill and committing him to the Mental Health Division for a maximum period of 180 days. We discuss only his argument that the failure to provide him with a copy of the examiner’s report at least 24 hours before the hearing, as ORS 426.074(3) requires, was error requiring reversal. Appellant’s attorney did not object to the late delivery of the report or to its admission at the hearing, nor did the attorney seek a continuance in order to examine the report and prepare a defense. See ORS 426.095(2)(c).

Appellant relies on State v. Allison, 129 Or App 47, 877 P2d 660 (1994), in which we held that the trial court’s failure to give the appellant the full advice that ORS 426.100(1) describes required a reversal of the commitment order. The information at issue in Allison was essential to the allegedly mentally ill person’s understanding of the nature and purpose of the hearing and thus implicated serious due process concerns. For that reason, Allison held that an objection was not necessary to preserve the error for appeal. Here, however, the failure to provide the report on time is essentially a question of providing adequate and timely discovery so that the person and the person’s lawyer may prepare for the hearing. There is no reason why the preservation rules that apply to other discovery and evidentiary issues should not apply in this case.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Maxwell, 988 P.2d 939, 164 Or. App. 171, 1999 Ore. App. LEXIS 1952 (Or. Ct. App. 1999).

988 P.2d 939 (State v. Maxwell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. T. C.
536 P.3d 591 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2023)
State v. K.J.B. (In re K.J.B.)
416 P.3d 291 (Oregon Supreme Court, 2018)
State v. M. T.
232 P.3d 980 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2011)
State v. MT
258 P.3d 1288 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2011)
State v. C. A. J.
213 P.3d 1279 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2009)
In Re Caj
213 P.3d 1279 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2009)