State v. Maxwell

738 N.E.2d 1252, 90 Ohio St. 3d 1478, 2000 Ohio LEXIS 3008
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Maxwell. Read the opinion of the Court — 95 Ohio St. 3d 254
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided December 5, 2000·No. 00-1812·Published

Opinion

Franklin App. No. 99AP-1177. This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal and cross-appeal and claimed appeal of right. On November 29, 2000, appellee/cross-appellant filed a memorandum in response and in support of cross-appeal that was due, pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. III(4)(A), no later than November 27, 2000. Whereas S.CtPrac.R. XIV(1)(C) prohibits untimely filings,

IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that appellee/cross-appellant’s memorandum in response and in support of cross-appeal be, and hereby is, stricken.

Whereas appellee/cross-appellant has not filed a memorandum in response and in support of cross-appeal within the time for perfecting his cross-appeal,

IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that the cross-appeal be, and hereby is, dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Maxwell, 738 N.E.2d 1252, 90 Ohio St. 3d 1478, 2000 Ohio LEXIS 3008 (Ohio 2000).

738 N.E.2d 1252 (State v. Maxwell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.