State v. Maxwell

736 N.E.2d 900, 90 Ohio St. 3d 1437, 90 Ohio St. 1437, 2000 Ohio LEXIS 2557
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 16, 2000
Docket00-1812
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 736 N.E.2d 900 (State v. Maxwell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Maxwell, 736 N.E.2d 900, 90 Ohio St. 3d 1437, 90 Ohio St. 1437, 2000 Ohio LEXIS 2557 (Ohio 2000).

Opinion

Franklin App. No. 99AP-1177. This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal and claimed appeal as of right. Upon consideration of appellant’s motion for stay of execution of court of appeals’ judgment pending appeal,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion for stay of execution of court of appeals’ judgment [1438]*1438pending appeal be, and hereby is, granted.

Pfeifer, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Maxwell, Unpublished Decision (10-26-2004)
2004 Ohio 5660 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
736 N.E.2d 900, 90 Ohio St. 3d 1437, 90 Ohio St. 1437, 2000 Ohio LEXIS 2557, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-maxwell-ohio-2000.