State v. Matthews

629 So. 2d 403, 1993 La. LEXIS 3428, 1993 WL 491005

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Matthews. Read the opinion of the Court — 1994 La. LEXIS 1971 →

Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided November 23, 1993·No. No. 93-KH-2728·Published

Opinion

In re Matthews, Clarence; — Defendant(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “A”, No. 280-029.

The relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely on a motion to correct an illegal sentence and to quash the multiple bill adjudication he has filed in June of 1993. If relator’s representation is cox1-rect, the district court is ordered to consider and act on the motion.

MARCUS, J., not on panel.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Matthews, Clarence; — Defendant(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “A”, No. 280-029.

MARCUS, J., not on panel.

State v. Matthews, 629 So. 2d 403, 1993 La. LEXIS 3428, 1993 WL 491005 (La. 1993).

Pincite

629 So. 2d 403 (State v. Matthews) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.