State v. Matthews

600 So. 2d 669, 1992 La. LEXIS 2283, 1992 WL 152811
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided June 29, 1992·No. No. 92-KH-1660·Published

Opinion

In re Matthews, Eddie; (Defendant), applying for writ of supervisory and or remedial writ; to the Criminal District Court, Parish of Orleans, Div. D, No. 285-103.

The relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely on a motion for production of documents he has filed on or about April 2, 1992. If relator’s representation is correct, the district court is ordered to consider and act on the motion. If relator’s representation is incorrect, the district court is ordered to accept, file and act upon the pleading which is herewith transferred to the district court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Matthews, 600 So. 2d 669, 1992 La. LEXIS 2283, 1992 WL 152811 (La. 1992).

600 So. 2d 669 (State v. Matthews) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.