State v. Mathews

Court of Appeals of Washington

State v. Mathews

482 P.2d 812, 4 Wash. App. 506, 1971 Wash. App. LEXIS 1383

CourtCourt of Appeals of Washington

DecidedMarch 19, 1971

DocketNo. 247-2

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 482 P.2d 812 (State v. Mathews) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Washington primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Mathews, 482 P.2d 812, 4 Wash. App. 506, 1971 Wash. App. LEXIS 1383 (Wash. Ct. App. 1971).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Defendant has appealed from a conviction of grand larceny. Defendant’s court-appointed counsel on appeal has filed an Anders brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 18 L. Ed. 2d 493, 87 S. Ct. 1396 (1967).

Defendant’s counsel has moved to withdraw and the prosecuting attorney moved to dismiss the appeal on the ground that it was frivolous.

We have reviewed the record and agree that no meritorious issues are presented by the record. Both motions are granted and the judgment and sentencé is affirmed.

It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI