State v. Mastic
120 A.2d 92, 20 N.J. 428
This text of 120 A.2d 92 (State v. Mastic) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
State v. Mastic, 120 A.2d 92, 20 N.J. 428 (N.J. 1956).
Opinion
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
THOMAS MASTIC, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
The Supreme Court of New Jersey.
*431 Mr. Thomas Mastic, in propria persona, for the appellant.
Mr. Guy Lee, Jr., Gloucester County Prosecutor, for the respondent.
PER CURIAM.
The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the court below.
For affirmance Chief Justice VANDERBILT, and Justices HEHER, OLIPHANT, WACHENFELD, BURLING, JACOBS and BRENNAN 7.
For reversal None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Boyer
226 F. Supp. 888 (D. New Jersey, 1963)
Worbetz v. Goodman
136 A.2d 1 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1957)
Application of Faas
125 A.2d 724 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1956)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
120 A.2d 92, 20 N.J. 428, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-mastic-nj-1956.