State v. Mastic

120 A.2d 92, 20 N.J. 428
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided January 23, 1956·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

20 N.J. 428 (1956)
120 A.2d 92

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
THOMAS MASTIC, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Submitted January 16, 1956.
Decided January 23, 1956.

*431 Mr. Thomas Mastic, in propria persona, for the appellant.

Mr. Guy Lee, Jr., Gloucester County Prosecutor, for the respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the court below.

For affirmance — Chief Justice VANDERBILT, and Justices HEHER, OLIPHANT, WACHENFELD, BURLING, JACOBS and BRENNAN — 7.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Mastic, 120 A.2d 92, 20 N.J. 428 (N.J. 1956).

120 A.2d 92 (State v. Mastic) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Boyer
226 F. Supp. 888 (D. New Jersey, 1963)
Worbetz v. Goodman
136 A.2d 1 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1957)
Application of Faas
125 A.2d 724 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1956)