State v. Mastic
120 A.2d 92, 20 N.J. 428
Opinion
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
THOMAS MASTIC, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
The Supreme Court of New Jersey.
*431 Mr. Thomas Mastic, in propria persona, for the appellant.
Mr. Guy Lee, Jr., Gloucester County Prosecutor, for the respondent.
PER CURIAM.
The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the court below.
For affirmance Chief Justice VANDERBILT, and Justices HEHER, OLIPHANT, WACHENFELD, BURLING, JACOBS and BRENNAN 7.
For reversal None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Mastic, 120 A.2d 92, 20 N.J. 428 (N.J. 1956).
120 A.2d 92 (State v. Mastic) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Boyer
226 F. Supp. 888 (D. New Jersey, 1963)
Worbetz v. Goodman
136 A.2d 1 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1957)
Application of Faas
125 A.2d 724 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1956)