State v. Martinez
This text of State v. Martinez (State v. Martinez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New Mexico Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO
2 STATE OF NEW MEXICO,
3 Plaintiff-Appellee,
4 v. No. 32,896
5 JOHN PAUL MARTINEZ,
6 Defendant-Appellant.
7 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BERNALILLO COUNTY 8 Denise Barela-Shepherd, District Judge
9 Gary K. King, Attorney General 10 Margaret McLean, Assistant Attorney General 11 Santa Fe, NM
12 for Appellee
13 Rothstein, Donatelli, Hughes, 14 Dahlstrom, Schoenburg & Bienvenu, LLP 15 Morgan Honeycutt 16 Evan P. Woodward 17 Santa Fe, NM
18 for Appellant
19 MEMORANDUM OPINION 1 BUSTAMANTE, Judge.
2 {1} Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of
3 proposed disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed,
4 and the time for doing so has expired.
5 {2} Affirmed.
6 {3} IT IS SO ORDERED.
8 _______________________________________ 9 MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge
10 WE CONCUR:
11 12 TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge
13 14 J. MILES HANISEE, Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
State v. Martinez, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-martinez-nmctapp-2014.