State v. Martinez
573 A.2d 353, 21 Conn. App. 813, 1990 Conn. App. LEXIS 102
This text of 573 A.2d 353 (State v. Martinez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Appellate Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
State v. Martinez, 573 A.2d 353, 21 Conn. App. 813, 1990 Conn. App. LEXIS 102 (Colo. Ct. App. 1990).
Opinion
The defendant claims, as error, and the state concedes, that nothing in the record indicates that the trial court informed the defendant of his fundamental right to a jury trial or elicited from him a waiver of that right.
There is error, the judgment of conviction is set aside and the case is remanded for a new trial.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
State v. Martinez
577 A.2d 1072 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 1990)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
573 A.2d 353, 21 Conn. App. 813, 1990 Conn. App. LEXIS 102, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-martinez-connappct-1990.