State v. Martinez
573 A.2d 353, 21 Conn. App. 813, 1990 Conn. App. LEXIS 102
Opinion
The defendant claims, as error, and the state concedes, that nothing in the record indicates that the trial court informed the defendant of his fundamental right to a jury trial or elicited from him a waiver of that right.
There is error, the judgment of conviction is set aside and the case is remanded for a new trial.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Martinez, 573 A.2d 353, 21 Conn. App. 813, 1990 Conn. App. LEXIS 102 (Colo. Ct. App. 1990).
573 A.2d 353 (State v. Martinez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Martinez
577 A.2d 1072 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 1990)