State v. Martinez

951 A.2d 571, 287 Conn. 918, 2008 Conn. LEXIS 253
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Martinez. Read the opinion of the Court — 295 Conn. 758
Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided June 10, 2008·No. SC 18168·Published

Opinion

The petition by the state of Connecticut for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 106 Conn. App. 517 (AC 26180), is granted, limited to the following issues:

“1. Did the Appellate Court correctly determine that the trial court improperly failed to grant the defendant an evidentiary hearing to determine the admissibility of evidence of the victim’s two prior sexual assaults, and correctly ordered the remedy of a new trial rather than an evidentiary hearing?

“2. Did the trial court deprive the defendant of his due process rights when it denied his request for funds for an expert witness?”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Martinez, 951 A.2d 571, 287 Conn. 918, 2008 Conn. LEXIS 253 (Colo. 2008).

951 A.2d 571 (State v. Martinez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Martinez
942 A.2d 1043 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2008)