State v. Martinez
962 A.2d 795, 290 Conn. 902, 2009 Conn. LEXIS 256
This text of 962 A.2d 795 (State v. Martinez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
State v. Martinez, 962 A.2d 795, 290 Conn. 902, 2009 Conn. LEXIS 256 (Colo. 2009).
Opinion
The petition by the state of Connecticut for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 106 Conn. App. 517 (AC 26180), is granted, limited to the following issues:
“1. Did the Appellate Court correctly determine that the trial court improperly failed to grant the defendant an evidentiary hearing to determine the admissibility of evidence of the victim’s two prior sexual assaults and correctly ordered the remedy of a new trial rather than an evidentiary hearing?
“2. Whether the remedy ordered by the Appellate Court with regard to two counts of the defendant’s conviction is improper because the error identified by the Appellate Court, even if upheld, is wholly irrelevant to and had no effect upon those counts?
“3. Did the trial court deprive the defendant of his due process rights when it denied his request for funds for an expert witness?”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
State v. Martinez
991 A.2d 1086 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2010)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
962 A.2d 795, 290 Conn. 902, 2009 Conn. LEXIS 256, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-martinez-conn-2009.