State v. Martin
Opinion
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Christopher Martin, Appellant.
Appellate Case No. 2015-001901
Appeal From Cherokee County R. Keith Kelly, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2016-UP-465 Submitted October 1, 2016 – Filed November 9, 2016
APPEAL DISMISSED
Appellate Defender Kathrine Haggard Hudgins, of Columbia, for Appellant.
Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General John Benjamin Aplin, both of Columbia; and Solicitor Barry Joe Barnette, of Spartanburg, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted. APPEAL DISMISSED.1
HUFF and SHORT, JJ., and MOORE, A.J., concur.
1 We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Martin (State v. Martin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.