State v. Martin

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Martin. Read the opinion of the Court — 403 S.C. 19
Court of Appeals of South Carolina·Decided October 21, 2015·No. 2015-UP-496·Unpublished

Opinion

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

John Bryan Martin, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2014-000627

Appeal From Greenville County Lee S. Alford, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2015-UP-496 Submitted August 1, 2015 – Filed October 21, 2015

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender David Alexander, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, both of Columbia, for Respondent. PER CURIAM: Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.1

APPEAL DISMISSED.

HUFF, WILLIAMS, and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

1 We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Martin, (S.C. Ct. App. 2015).

State v. Martin (State v. Martin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)