State v. Mangham
541 So. 2d 166, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 901, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 1934, 1989 WL 33991
Opinion
Appellee concedes that the sentence must be reversed because the trial court failed to give written reasons to support a downward departure from the sentencing guidelines. See State v. Jackson, 478 So.2d 1054 (Fla.1985); State v. Dixon, 539 So.2d 38 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989); State v. Vickery, 536 So.2d 380 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989); State v. Martinez, 534 So.2d 1248 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988); State v. Wayda, 533 So.2d 939 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988); State v. Adams, 528 So.2d 548 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988).
The sentence is reversed and the cause remanded for further proceedings.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Mangham, 541 So. 2d 166, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 901, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 1934, 1989 WL 33991 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).
541 So. 2d 166 (State v. Mangham) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Wayda
533 So. 2d 939 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)
State v. Martinez
534 So. 2d 1248 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)
State v. Adams
528 So. 2d 548 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)
State v. Jackson
478 So. 2d 1054 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1985)
State v. Vickery
536 So. 2d 380 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)
State v. Dixon
539 So. 2d 38 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)