State v. Dixon

539 So. 2d 38, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 683, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 1316, 1989 WL 21470
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 14, 1989
DocketNo. 88-1962
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 539 So. 2d 38 (State v. Dixon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Dixon, 539 So. 2d 38, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 683, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 1316, 1989 WL 21470 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The trial court failed to provide any reasons for its downward departure from the sentencing guidelines. The defendant concedes, correctly, that a sentence which departs downward from the guidelines must be supported by written reasons as required by section 921.001(6), Florida Statutes (1987), and Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure 3.701(b)(6) and 3.701(d)(ll). See State v. Vickery, 536 So.2d 380 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989); State v. Martinez, 534 So.2d 1248 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988); State v. Wayda, 533 So.2d 939 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988); State v. Adams, 528 So.2d 548 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988).

The sentence is vacated and the cause is remanded for further consistent proceedings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Mangham
541 So. 2d 166 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
539 So. 2d 38, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 683, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 1316, 1989 WL 21470, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-dixon-fladistctapp-1989.