State v. Malone

303 S.W.3d 166, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 152, 2010 WL 530198
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 16, 2010·No. ED 91863·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Terrelle M. Malone (hereinafter, “Appellant”) appeals from the trial court’s judgment after a jury convicted him of three counts of statutory rape in the second degree, Section 566.034 RSMo (2000), and one count of statutory sodomy in the second degree, Section 566.064 RSMo (2000). Appellant was sentenced to a term totaling twenty-two years’ imprisonment. Appellant raises one point on appeal, arguing the trial court plainly erred in admitting testimony which constituted evidence of uncharged bad acts, which he claims were irrelevant and prejudicial.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the transcript on appeal. We find no error of law. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion, only for the use of the parties, setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Malone, 303 S.W.3d 166, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 152, 2010 WL 530198 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

303 S.W.3d 166 (State v. Malone) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Johnson
303 S.W.3d 166 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2010)