State v. Johnson

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Johnson

303 S.W.3d 169, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 187, 2010 WL 605311

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedFebruary 23, 2010

DocketWD 70469

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 303 S.W.3d 169 (State v. Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Johnson, 303 S.W.3d 169, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 187, 2010 WL 605311 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

Order

PER CURIAM.

Robert Johnson appeals his conviction by jury on one count of second-degree statutory rape and one count of forcible rape. Johnson contends the circuit court plainly erred in denying his motion to suppress DNA evidence. Upon review of the briefs and the record, we find no manifest injustice and affirm the convictions. Because a published opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we have provided the parties with a Memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision.

AFFIRMED. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order

PER CURIAM.

Robert Johnson appeals his conviction by jury on one count of second-degree statutory rape and one count of forcible rape. Johnson contends the circuit court plainly erred in denying his motion to suppress DNA evidence. Upon review of the briefs and the record, we find no manifest injustice and affirm the convictions. Because a published opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we have provided the parties with a Memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision.

AFFIRMED. Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

303 S.W.3d 169, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 187, 2010 WL 605311, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-johnson-moctapp-2010.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack