Home/Court of Appeals of Oregon/State v. Maddox

State v. Maddox

203 P.3d 367, 226 Or. App. 417
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedMarch 4, 2009
Docket020533049, A120902
StatusPublished

This text of 203 P.3d 367 (State v. Maddox) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Maddox, 203 P.3d 367, 226 Or. App. 417 (Or. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion

203 P.3d 367 (2009)
226 Or. App. 417

STATE of Oregon, Plaintiff-Respondent,
v.
Christopher Dorian MADDOX, Defendant-Appellant.

020533049, A120902.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Submitted on Remand October 28, 2008.
Decided March 4, 2009.

Rebecca A. Duncan, Assistant Chief Defender, Office of Public Defense Services, for appellant.

Hardy Myers, Attorney General, Mary H. Williams, Solicitor General, and Tiffany Keast, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

Before LANDAU, Presiding Judge, and BREWER, Chief Judge, and HASELTON, Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. State v. Henson, 226 Or.App. 135, 203 P.3d 244 (2009).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Henson
203 P.3d 244 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2009)
State v. Maddox
203 P.3d 367 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
203 P.3d 367, 226 Or. App. 417, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-maddox-orctapp-2009.