State v. MacY
This text of 643 P.2d 877 (State v. MacY) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
STATE of Oregon, Respondent,
v.
Calvin Lloyd MACY, Appellant.
Court of Appeals of Oregon.
*878 Ernest E. Estes, Deputy Public Defender, Salem, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was Gary D. Babcock, Public Defender, Salem.
Robert E. Barton, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., and William F. Gary, Sol. Gen., Salem.
Before BUTTLER, P.J., and RICHARDSON and WARDEN, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
The judgment of conviction is affirmed. However, because the trial court imposed the statutory minimum sentence of 25 years pursuant to ORS 163.115(5), the sentence is vacated and the cause remanded for resentencing. State v. Shumway, 291 Or. 153, 630 P.2d 796 (1981).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
643 P.2d 877, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-macy-orctapp-1982.