State v. Macalla
This text of 2009 Ohio 1904 (State v. Macalla) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[Cite as State v. Macalla, 121 Ohio St.3d 606, 2009-Ohio-1904.]
THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. MACALLA, APPELLANT. [Cite as State v. Macalla, 121 Ohio St.3d 606, 2009-Ohio-1904.] Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed on the authority of State v. Thompson. (No. 2008-0678 — Submitted April 21, 2009 — Decided April 29, 2009.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County, No. 88825, 2008-Ohio-569. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of State v. Thompson, 121 Ohio St.3d 250, 2009-Ohio-314, 903 N.E.2d 618. MOYER, C.J., and PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’CONNOR, O’DONNELL, LANZINGER, and CUPP, JJ., concur. __________________ William D. Mason, Cuyahoga County Prosecuting Attorney, and Lisa Reitz Williamson, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee. Timothy Young, State Public Defender, and Sarah M. Schregardus, Assistant State Public Defender, for appellant. ______________________
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2009 Ohio 1904, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-macalla-ohio-2009.