State v. M. M.
277 P.3d 624, 249 Or. App. 519, 2012 WL 1419880, 2012 Ore. App. LEXIS 517
Opinion
Appellant seeks reversal of a judgment committing him as a mentally ill person for a period not to exceed 180 days. ORS 426.130. Appellant argues that the record does not establish by clear and convincing evidence that he is a danger to others or unable to provide for his basic needs because of a mental disorder. See ORS 426.005(1)(e). The state concedes that the evidence is legally insufficient for involuntary commitment and that the judgment should be reversed. We agree, accept the state’s concession, and reverse.
Reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. M. M., 277 P.3d 624, 249 Or. App. 519, 2012 WL 1419880, 2012 Ore. App. LEXIS 517 (Or. Ct. App. 2012).
277 P.3d 624 (State v. M. M.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In the Matter of Mm
277 P.3d 624 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2012)