In the Matter of Mm
This text of 277 P.3d 624 (In the Matter of Mm) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In the Matter of M.M., Alleged to be a Mentally Ill Person.
STATE of Oregon, Respondent,
v.
M.M., Appellant.
Court of Appeals of Oregon.
Michael Breiling filed the brief for appellant.
John R. Kroger, Attorney General, Anna M. Joyce, Solicitor General, and Laura S. Anderson, Senior Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.
Before SCHUMAN, Presiding Judge, and WOLLHEIM, Judge, and NAKAMOTO, Judge.
PER CURIAM.
Appellant seeks reversal of a judgment committing him as a mentally ill person for a period not to exceed 180 days. ORS 426.130. Appellant argues that the record does not establish by clear and convincing evidence that he is a danger to others or unable to provide for his basic needs because of a mental disorder. See ORS 426.005(1)(e). The state concedes that the evidence is legally insufficient for involuntary commitment and that the judgment should be reversed. We agree, accept the state's concession, and reverse.
Reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
277 P.3d 624, 249 Or. App. 519, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-matter-of-mm-orctapp-2012.