State v. Lowery

150 S.E.2d 23, 268 N.C. 162, 1966 N.C. LEXIS 1151
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided September 21, 1966·No. 9·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Defendant’s principal contention is that the court should have granted his motion for nonsuit at the conclusion of the State’s evidence, principally on the ground that this was not a public place.

Intentional exposure of private parts while sitting in an. automobile on a public street in such manner that they could be seen by members of the passing public using the street, and were seen by a passerby, constitutes the common law offence of indecent exposure. Noblett v. Commonwealth, 194 Va. 241, 72 S.E. 2d 241; State v. Edwards, 233 N.C. 492, 64 S.E. 2d 421.

State’s witnesses positively identified the defendant as the person who exposed his private parts in a public place.

The defendant noted several exceptions to the court’s rulings on evidentiary matters and to portions of the charge to the jury. Upon examination we find none of them of substantial merit.

The evidence was sufficient to support the verdict, and we find

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Lowery, 150 S.E.2d 23, 268 N.C. 162, 1966 N.C. LEXIS 1151 (N.C. 1966).

150 S.E.2d 23 (State v. Lowery) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. King
201 S.E.2d 724 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1974)
State v. King
151 S.E.2d 566 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1966)