State v. King

151 S.E.2d 566, 268 N.C. 711, 1966 N.C. LEXIS 1295
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided December 14, 1966·No. 676·Published·Cited by 17 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

“ ‘Public place’ means a place which in point of fact is public as distinguished from private, but not necessarily a place devoted solely to the uses of the public, a place that is visited by many persons and to which the neighboring public may have resort, a place which is accessible to the public and visited by many persons. Ellis v. Archer, 161 N.W. 192; People v. Lane, 32 N.Y.S. 2d 61. A mercantile establishment and the premises thereof is a public place during business hours when customers are coming and going.” S. v. Fenner, 263 N.C. 694, 140 S.E. 2d 349.

We said in the recent case of S. v. Lowery, 268 N.C. 162, 150 S.E. 2d 23: “Intentional exposure of private parts while sitting in *712 an automobile on a public street in such manner that they could be seen by members of the passing public using the street and were seen by a passerby constitutes common law offense of indecent exposure.”

“It is not essential to the- crime of indecent exposure that someone shall have seen the exposure provided it was intentionally made in a public place and persons were present who could have seen if they had looked.” 33 Am. Jur. 19.

“The offense does not depend upon the number of people present and an intentional act of lewd exposure offensive to one or more persons is sufficient.” 67 C.J.S. 26.

It appears from the above that all the elements necessary to constitute the crime of indecent exposure were shown by the State’s evidence. The jury accepted it as true, and in the trial there was

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. King, 151 S.E.2d 566, 268 N.C. 711, 1966 N.C. LEXIS 1295 (N.C. 1966).

151 S.E.2d 566 (State v. King) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Hoyle
818 S.E.2d 149 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2018)
State v. Pugh
780 S.E.2d 226 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2015)
Wisneski v. State
921 A.2d 273 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 2007)
In re R.L.C.
635 S.E.2d 1 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2006)
State v. Fusco
523 S.E.2d 741 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1999)
State v. Magliocco, C.A. N3/98-0325a (1999)
Superior Court of Rhode Island, 1999
State v. Folks
723 So. 2d 369 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)
State v. Fly
501 S.E.2d 656 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1998)
State v. Streath
327 S.E.2d 240 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1985)
State v. King
204 S.E.2d 667 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1974)
State v. King
201 S.E.2d 724 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1974)
City of St. Paul v. Kekedakis
199 N.W.2d 151 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1972)
State v. Pallman
248 A.2d 589 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 1968)