State v. Longlois

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State v. Longlois

369 So. 2d 138, 1979 La. LEXIS 6175

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedMarch 16, 1979

DocketNo. 64005

StatusPublished

This text of 369 So. 2d 138 (State v. Longlois) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Longlois, 369 So. 2d 138, 1979 La. LEXIS 6175 (La. 1979).

Pincite

Opinion

In re Victor Longlois and James S. Moore applying for writs of certiorari and review. Parish of Natchitoches.

Granted.

The petition of the relator in the above entitled and numbered case having been duly considered,

It is ordered that a writ of certiorari issue herein, directing the Honorable Richard B. Williams, Judge of the Tenth Judicial District Court for the Parish of Natchitoches, to transmit to the Supreme Court of Louisiana, on or before the 30th day of March, 1979, the record in duplicate, or a certified copy of the record in duplicate, of the proceedings complained of by the relator herein, to the .end that the validity of said proceedings may be ascertained.

It is further ordered that the aforesaid Judge of said Court and the respondent through counsel shall show cause, in this Court, on a date to be fixed by this Court, why the relief prayed for in the petition of the relator should not be granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Victor Longlois and James S. Moore applying for writs of certiorari and review. Parish of Natchitoches.

Granted.

The petition of the relator in the above entitled and numbered case having been duly considered,

It is ordered that a writ of certiorari issue herein, directing the Honorable Richard B. Williams, Judge of the Tenth Judicial District Court for the Parish of Natchitoches, to transmit to the Supreme Court of Louisiana, on or before the 30th day of March, 1979, the record in duplicate, or a certified copy of the record in duplicate, of the proceedings complained of by the relator herein, to the .end that the validity of said proceedings may be ascertained.

It is further ordered that the aforesaid Judge of said Court and the respondent through counsel shall show cause, in this Court, on a date to be fixed by this Court, why the relief prayed for in the petition of the relator should not be granted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

369 So. 2d 138, 1979 La. LEXIS 6175, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-longlois-la-1979.